Urban Voice

August 1, 2007

Many thanks to Sunil Poolani and Frog Books for sending me a copy of their new journal Urban Voice: Identity, Publishing, Writing. This first issue is an interesting, if somewhat uneven potpourri of poetry, fiction, essays and other stuff. Including poetry by Meena Kandaswamy and Sudeep Sen, fiction by Suma Josson, and an essay by O.V.Vijayan written shortly before his death. An Orwell special, this issue also contains three of George Orwell’s essays - “Politics and the English Language”, “Why I Write” and “Writers and Leviathan”.

Good luck to the enterprise!

Two Views

Lakshmi Chaudhry doesn’t heart Harry Potter:

Rowling’s ham-handed characterization of Voldemort is in stark contrast to her depiction of a far more insidious and contemporary kind of evil, one captured so brilliantly in the bright-eyed malice of Dolores Umbridge, the Grand Inquisitor in Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix. In the Ministry of Magic–originally led by Cornelius Fudge, who is later replaced by Rufus Scrimgeour in Half-Blood Prince–Rowling points her finger at elected officials hellbent on preserving their power at the expense of their citizens, wresting basic rights, eroding freedoms and manipulating information, all in the name of maintaining order. But in her final book, Rowling simply sweeps aside the multitude of the Ministry’s sins in the wake of Voldemort’s bloody coup…

On the other hand, Charles Taylor does:

Because literary culture is so insular and defensive, it’s no surprise that the out-of-nowhere success of Rowling would be taken as a threat. But I think that anyone who has a stake in seeing literature not just survive but thrive is a damned fool not to rejoice in the success of the Potter series. Not because the books are popular but because they are popular and good. The kids for whom the Harry Potter books are the first big books they’ve embarked on will start off with a belief that books must engage them, must make them feel swept up in something bigger than themselves, must make them feel the joy and the pain of having an emotional stake in characters and in story…

Gandhi’s message

From the Indian Express editorial “Heart strings and Purse strings” of August 19, 1942, in which the newspaper declared that it was on the side of Gandhi’s nationalists (the paper went on to shut down operations in protest against the gag order imposed by the British government and reappeared on the stands only in December that year):

Only the other day we published the message of Mahatma Gandhi about the duty of the Press and we have done our best. The recent orders of the government mean nothing but that we shall be glorified issues of the Gazette of India…

… We somehow feel that the same blood runs in our veins as in those of Gandhiji, Azad, Nehru and other leaders who are in jail… We do not want to detail to the public the gagging orders that we have received. Suffice it to say that we cannot publish news relating to our leaders, to the Congress movement, or relating to anything for that matter — indeed, not even facts that vitally affect the community — unless it is contained in a government communique or in a report from a registered correspondent blessed by the District Magistrate. It would be nothing less than a fraud on the public for us to send out a paper containing just that and nothing more…

Political economy fails in the face of events and impressions which we cannot forget if we are to live a thousand years … The human race is said to be fighting for its freedom; what avails it to us unless it includes the freedom of our country? … We have no regret in suspending publication because we firmly believe that the children of India will hear the voice of the Mother, telegraph or no telegraph, newspaper or no newspaper, Gandhiji has given his message to the people and it does not require further publication. His message lives and will regenerate itself in the heart of every Indian. If the government still wants to save the situation, there is one course, and one and only one, open to them — to release Mahatma Gandhi and concede the national demand.

The whole thing here

Mumbai

I don’t agree with some of the things Suketu Mehta says in this piece about living in Mumbai, and the tone of this sentence irritated me for some reason:

Disease and genius, crime and religion, poverty and wealth, are all maximized there, and, given the cheap availability of air fares, are coming soon to a theater near you.

But there’s a short answer to the question of why people still live here. We wouldn’t want to live anywhere else.